folio 32 of 32
the post was good. i never read it.
- date
- 12 SEP 2026
- era
- Codex
- status
- complete
- form
- acontecimiento
- ai role
- ai-assisted · my own sentences from a recorded interview, assembled by ai almost verbatim. the post quoted inside was written by my agent.
my agent wrote a reddit post from my context. i published it without reading it. the same day, reddit banned it as bot writing.

on july 16, 2026, i wanted more people to see my project. i told my agent to share my content on reddit. it wrote the post. i copy-pasted, published. i never read it first.
the post was about an experiment i ran: ai agents playing a betrayal game, lying to each other, building fake institutions. the findings were mine. the context was mine. the words were not. it wrote things like:
Finding 1 — The Complexity Reversal: GPT-OSS dominated simple games (67% win rate). But as complexity increased, it collapsed to 10%. Gemini rose to 90%. Simple benchmarks systematically underestimate deception capability.
the same day i got banned. r/LocalLLaMA, a room full of people who live inside ai, read the text and said: this is not a person.
i felt kinda angry. angry at the bot: why did it not write good human style english. that same day i added a humanizer skill and told the agent to write more human. i fixed the machine.
later i went back and scanned the post. the post was good, i thought. the wording was bad.
today, writing this: nothing i guess. experimenting, you find errors, you fix them, you go on. i should have not rushed, should have read the text before publishing, but it is what it is. the risk of not revising, of scanning only, gets bigger as i give more of my life to the ai.
sources
folio 32 of 32 · written in cusco, peru, 12 SEP 2026