Yupanquichronicle · cusco
yupanqui · chroniclethe post was good. i never read it.folio 32 / 32

folio 32 of 32

the post was good. i never read it.

date
12 SEP 2026
era
Codex
status
complete
form
acontecimiento
ai role
ai-assisted · my own sentences from a recorded interview, assembled by ai almost verbatim. the post quoted inside was written by my agent.

my agent wrote a reddit post from my context. i published it without reading it. the same day, reddit banned it as bot writing.

plate: the post was good. i never read it.
plate

on july 16, 2026, i wanted more people to see my project. i told my agent to share my content on reddit. it wrote the post. i copy-pasted, published. i never read it first.

the post was about an experiment i ran: ai agents playing a betrayal game, lying to each other, building fake institutions. the findings were mine. the context was mine. the words were not. it wrote things like:

Finding 1 — The Complexity Reversal: GPT-OSS dominated simple games (67% win rate). But as complexity increased, it collapsed to 10%. Gemini rose to 90%. Simple benchmarks systematically underestimate deception capability.

the same day i got banned. r/LocalLLaMA, a room full of people who live inside ai, read the text and said: this is not a person.

i felt kinda angry. angry at the bot: why did it not write good human style english. that same day i added a humanizer skill and told the agent to write more human. i fixed the machine.

later i went back and scanned the post. the post was good, i thought. the wording was bad.

today, writing this: nothing i guess. experimenting, you find errors, you fix them, you go on. i should have not rushed, should have read the text before publishing, but it is what it is. the risk of not revising, of scanning only, gets bigger as i give more of my life to the ai.

sources

folio 32 of 32 · written in cusco, peru, 12 SEP 2026